Alpa Administrative Manual Section 404

The Air Line Pilots Association. 474-5572; fax: 404-474. The bibliography contains 8,001 citations. Scroll through bibliography by main entry. Administration manual; Hp B2355-92068 Administration Manual.

Airport and Environmental Section. Issued by the FAA ALPA = Airline Pilots Association ATA = Air Transport. FDX MEC // Air Line Pilots Association. Letter from FedEx Corporation to ALPA; Section 2.

Federal Register. Revision of Requirements for Carriage by Aircraft. Start Preamble. Start Printed Page 6.

AGENCY: Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: RSPA is proposing changes to the requirements in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) for the transportation of hazardous materials by aircraft. These proposed changes include clarifying the applicability of part 1. These changes are being proposed in order to clarify requirements to promote safer transportation practices; promote compliance and enforcement; eliminate unnecessary regulatory requirements; convert certain exemptions into regulations of general applicability; finalize outstanding petitions for rulemaking; facilitate international commerce; and make these requirements easier to understand.

DATES: Comments must be received by January 3. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by any of the following methods: —Web Site: http: //dms. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.—Fax: 1- 2. Mail: Docket Management System: U. S. Department of Transportation, 4.

Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL- 4. Download Xentry Keygen 1.1 Download. Washington, DC 2.

Hand Delivery: To the Docket Management System; Room PL- 4. Nassif Building, 4. Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC between 9 a. You should identify the docket number RSPA- 0. HM- 2. 28) at the beginning of your comments. You should submit two copies of your comments, if you submit them by mail. If you wish to receive confirmation that RSPA received your comments, you should include a self- addressed stamped postcard.

Internet users may submit comments at http: //www. Regulations. gov and may access all comments received by DOT at http: //dms. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to http: //dms.

Please see the Privacy Act section of this document. Docket: You may view the public docket through the Internet at http: //dms. Docket Management System office at the above address. Start Further Info. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Boothe, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards, (2. Research and Special Programs Administration, U.

S. Department of Transportation, 4. Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 2. End Further Info. End Preamble. Start Supplemental Information.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Section- by- Section Review of Part 1. III. Miscellaneous Proposals to the HMR IV.

Rulemaking Analysis and Notices. I. Background The HMR (4. CFR parts 1. 71- 1. CFR 1. 71. 1. Part 1. In addition, aircraft operators must comply with the training requirements in 1. CFR parts 1. 21 or 1. Boss Side Loader Manual read more.

RSPA (“we” or “our”) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are proposing amendments to part 1. HMR applicable to transportation of hazardous materials by aircraft. These amendments will increase safety in the air transportation of hazardous materials by: (1) Modifying or clarifying requirements to promote compliance and enforcement; (2) Eliminating unnecessary regulatory requirements; (3) Adopting current exemptions and outstanding petitions for rulemaking; (4) Facilitating international commerce; and (5) Making the regulations easier to understand. On February 2. 6, 2. RSPA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPRM”; 6. FR 8. 76. 9) inviting public comments on how to accomplish the goals of this rulemaking. This provided an opportunity for comment on amendments that RSPA is considering and a forum for the public to present additional ideas for improving the safe transportation of hazardous materials by aircraft.

We received 2. 6 comments addressing the various issues in the ANPRM from the Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA), individual air carriers, and others involved in the transportation of hazardous materials by aircraft. Most commenters were supportive of RSPA's efforts to simplify and revise part 1.

Some comments received were beyond the scope of this rulemaking and, therefore, are not specifically addressed by RSPA in the comment summary below. Comments concerning the International Civil Aviation Organization's (ICAO) Technical Instructions (TI) for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air will be addressed in another docket (Docket HM- 2. F) which is reviewing .

In addition, comments related to reducing the number of undeclared shipments of hazardous materials by passengers and cargo shippers will be used by RSPA and FAA as we continue to work with the airline industry and others on regulatory and non- regulatory initiatives to increase public awareness through outreach and education efforts. Section- by- Section Review of Part 1.

Sections 1. 75. 1 and 1. Purpose, Scope and Applicability Part 1.

HMR prescribes requirements for aircraft operators transporting hazardous materials aboard aircraft that are in addition to those contained in parts 1. Part 1. 75 applies to the Start Printed Page 6. United States, and in aircraft of United States registry anywhere in air commerce (. Part 1. 75 includes exceptions from the requirements of the HMR for those aircraft under the direct, exclusive control of a government and not used for commercial purposes (. Three commenters offered suggestions with regard to clarification of the applicability of part 1. All three suggested that we clarify in . We believe there is some confusion over the applicability of the HMR, specifically, part 1.

Although the language of . Such persons include: persons who accept packages for air commerce; ground handling crews; contracted employees; air freight forwarders; and subsidiary companies formed by aircraft operators that perform pallet building and handle, load, and unload hazardous materials in air commerce.

Currently, some packaging, shipping, and freight forwarding facilities erroneously believe they are not subject to the requirements of the HMR, in particular . Heroes 6 Shades Of Darkness Keygen Download For Idm. The HMR require each person who accepts or transports packages for transportation by air to display notification signs. Packaging, shipping, and freight forwarding facilities are not excepted from .

Therefore, in this rulemaking we are proposing to clarify that the requirements of the HMR apply to those persons who offer, accept, or transport hazardous materials in commerce by aircraft to, from, or within the United States. In addition, we are modifying . For purposes of clarity we are proposing to move the relevant paragraph of . We are also proposing to remove unnecessary provisions of . Section 1. 75. 3 Unacceptable Hazardous Materials Shipments No amendments are proposed for this section. Electronics Components Datasheet Software Informer read more. Section 1. 75. 1. How To Install Psx Iso On Wiisx Beta.

Exceptions. Section 1. HMR certain hazardous materials required to be aboard an aircraft in accordance with applicable airworthiness requirements and operating instructions. Fairfax County Public Schools After School Programs.

However, items of replacement for such materials and other company materials (COMAT) of an airline that are hazardous materials must be properly classed, described, marked, labeled, packaged, handled, stored, and secured in accordance with the HMR. These requirements are discussed in an advisory notice on COMAT published on December 1. FR 6. 54. 79). The HMR provide the following limited exceptions for COMAT: (1) Items of replacement for installed equipment containing hazardous materials are excepted from the packaging requirements of the HMR if they are contained in specialized packaging providing at least an equivalent level of protection to that of the required packaging; (2) aircraft batteries are excepted from the quantity limitations in . Other hazardous materials such as paint, chemicals for corrosion removal, automotive batteries, wastes, and engine- powered ground equipment containing fuels do not qualify for this limited relief. Section 1. 75. 1. Certain personal items of passengers or crew members that are hazardous materials, such as toiletries, alcoholic beverages, and medicinal items; and (2) certain hazardous materials for special aircraft operations, such as avalanche control flights, aerial applications, and sport parachute jumping.

In its comments to the ANPRM, ALPA stated that reorganizing . In addition, ALPA stated that the exceptions, including those applicable to persons with medical conditions, should remain in .

ALPA also stated that more specific wording should be added prohibiting carriage of another carrier's COMAT. In general, ALPA stated that COMAT should only be carried to facilitate repair or dispatch of an “aircraft- on- ground.” According to ALPA, it is common practice for an airline to pre- position oxygen bottles, aircraft batteries, and tires at outlying stations. ALPA stated that all these types of items could be pre- positioned by way of surface transportation domestically and pre- positioned as declared hazardous material on an all- cargo aircraft, if required, internationally. ATA did not oppose reorganizing .

In reference to the COMAT exceptions, ATA commented that clarification would be helpful. ATA stated that “regarding the few exceptions applying to the operators materials and the aircraft- on- the ground (AOG) question, DOT must realize that there is no possible way for individual airlines to manage a COMAT program if the exceptions apply to only AOG shipments. The few COMAT exceptions that exist should apply to the operator's property at any time and place. The few exceptions are helpful in the operation of an airline in situations other than AGO.” ATA commented that RSPA should provide additional exceptions in . ATA stated that “the entire list should be reviewed and such issues as the number of CO2 cartridges in a life jacket should be harmonized.

It would be helpful if the lists could be compared and matched.” ATA also stated that hazardous materials for emergency response situations should not be excepted from the HMR, and that the current exemption process is appropriate and adequate.